Fluid Limits and Random Graphs

The other day Christina Goldschmidt gave a very nice talk on results obtained by James Norris and R. W. R. Darling: in their paper they use fluid limit techniques in order to study properties a Random graphs. This approach has long been used to analyse queuing systems for example.

1. Erdos Renyi Random Graph model

Remember that the Erdos Renyi random graph {\mathcal{G}(N,p)} is a graph with {N} vertices {\{1,2, \ldots, N\}} such that any two of them are connected with probability {p}, independently.

Erdos-Renyi random graph model

Erdos-Renyi random graph model

This model of random graphs has been extensively studied and this has long been known that {G(N,\frac{c}{N})} undergoes a phase transition at {c=1}: for {c<1}, the largest component {L^{(N,c)}} of {\mathcal{G}(N,\frac{c}{N})} has a size of order {\log(N)} while for {c>1} the largest connected component {L^{(N,c)}}, also called the giant component, has size of order {N}. In another blog entry, another consequence of this phase transition has been used.

One can even show that for {c>1} there exists a constant {K_c} such that for any {\epsilon > 0},

\displaystyle  \lim_{N \rightarrow \infty} \; \; \mathop{\mathbb P}\Big( |\frac{\textrm{Card}(L^{(N,c)})}{N} - K_c| > \epsilon \Big) = 0.

Simply put, the largest connected component of {\mathcal{G}(N,\frac{c}{N})} has size approximatively equal to {K_c \cdot N}. Maybe surprisingly, this is quite simple to compute the value of {K(c)} through fluid limit techniques.

2. Exploration of the graph

Let {G} be a configuration of {\mathcal{G}(N, \frac{c}{N})}. This configuration is explored through a classical depth-first algorithm. To keep track of what is doing, a process {Z_k: \{1, \ldots, N\} \rightarrow \mathbb{Z}} is introduced. This process captures essentially all the information needed to study the size of the connected component: it is then shown that {Z} behaves essentially deterministically when looked under the appropriate scale.

  1. initilisation: t=0: Color all the vertices in green, the current vertex is {v=1} and define {Z_1=0}.
  2. t=t+1: Color the current vertex in red (=visited): if a vertex is connected to {v} and is green, color it in grey ( this vertex has still to be visited, but its ‘parent’ has already been visited): these are the children of {v}.
  3. update {Z} the following way, {Z_t = Z_{t-1} + (\textrm{Nb of children of }v) - 1}, and
    • if {v} has children, choose one of them and make it the new current vertex. Go to {2}.
    • If {v} has no children then the new current vertex is its parent. Go to {2}.
    • if {v} has no children and no parent, the new current vertex is one of the remaining (if any) green vertex. Go to {2}
    • else: we are finished.

depth first exploration

A moment of though reveals that {Z_1=0} and {Z} reaches {-1} precisely when the connected component of the vertex {1} has all been explored. Then {Z} reaches {-2} precisely when the second connected component has all been explored, etc … This is why if {T_0=1} and {T_k = \inf \{t: Z_t = -k\}} then the connected components have size exactly {S_k = T_{k+1}-T_k} for {k=0,1,2, \ldots}. The largest component has size {\max_k S_k}.

Z process

3. Fluid Limit

It is quite easy to show why the rescaled process {z^N(t) = \frac{ Z([Nt])}{N}} should behave like a differential equation (ie: fluid limit). While exploring the first component, {Z_k} represents the number of gray vertices at time {k} so that {N-k-Z_k} represents the number of green vertices: this is why

\displaystyle  \mathop{\mathbb E}\Big[Z_{k+1}-Z_k \;|Z_k \Big] = (N-k-Z_k) \frac{c}{N} = c\Big(1-\frac{k}{N} - \frac{Z_k}{N} \Big) - 1

so that {\mathop{\mathbb E}\Big[ \frac{z^N(t+\Delta)-z^N(t)}{\Delta} | z^N(t) \Big] \approx c\Big(1-t-z(t) \Big) - 1} where {\Delta = \frac{1}{N}}. Also, the variance statisfies {\text{Var}\Big[ \frac{z^N(t+\Delta)-z^N(t)}{\sqrt{\Delta}} | z^N(t) \Big] \approx N^{-\frac{1}{2}} c\Big(1-t-z(t) \Big) \rightarrow 0} so that all the ingredients for a fluit limit are present: {z^N} converges to the differential equation

\displaystyle  \frac{d}{dt} z(t) = c\Big(1-t-z(t) \Big) - 1

whose solution is {z(t) = (1-t)-e^{-ct}}. This is why {K=K_c > 0} is implicitly defined as the solution of

\displaystyle  1-K_c = e^{-c K_c}.

As expected, {\lim_{c \rightarrow 1^+} K_c = 0} and {\lim_{c \rightarrow +\infty} K_c = 1}.

Fluid Limit


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: